About your Search

20140226
20140306
Search Results 0 to 14 of about 15 (some duplicates have been removed)
up energy production all over the countr country, fracking, you tell me, these five things, i would think the alternative party in the country could agree with? >> well, sean, to quote jerry mcguire, you had me at hello. >> i'm trying to get an answer. >> i completely agree. yes, yes, yes and yes. you're exactly right. but look, that is presenting a positive pro-growth vision. there is a better way. we can bring back economic growth and get people back to work but not continuing down the road of the obama economic policy which is hurting millions of american's all over this country. >> are you seriously considering, a lot of people banter your name out there, are you considering a run for the 2016 presidency? >> well, i appreciate the question. right now i'm trying to win the senate. i think republicans can take control of the senate in 2014. my view as a senator, as a voter, the person who i intend to vote for is whoever is standing up and leading, whoever is effectively leading. i hope everyone stepping up. i hope we have an abundance of riches. that would be a terrific outcome fo
the government off the backs and the necks of energy companies, as i have interviewed more people in the energy world. there is more energy combined in this country, shell oil, gas and coal than in the entire middle east combined. >> they're not going to complain there is a fracking problem in his neighborhood. >> he is seeing over it. >> and the polls show that most women wish they had the luxury to stay at home and raise their children. but what the vice president is talking about is not the luxury to stay home, it is doing it on other taxpayer's dimes, to get the subsidies in order to buy the health care plans. >> that is exactly what he is saying. >> not what he is talking about. >> the family of four. >> i agree. >> he is taking money from taxpayers to support -- to not work. >> real quick. >> if you stay home with children you know you are working more than any of us who are working full-time jobs. >> wait a minute. >> sean -- >> but who is paying for her to stay home. >> oh, my goodness. >> that is how liberals would like it. >> it is hard, hard work. >> i know it is hard work but why --
, the reality is that russia has a lot of nuclear weapons. their economy is modest except for energy, and they're not a great power, but they have the ability to pick them off one at a time. their neighbors abroad, they can do that, they went into georgia as you'll recall. ukraine is enormously important to the world. and the idea that we would have created an environment that is hospitable is outrageous. it's not just putin, it's going to be the people's republic of china. even if it's not in cahoots with put putin. >> it seems like the president and the secretary of state keep lecturing putin, that they have a 19th century mentality, this is the 21st century. he made a speech where -- in which he says the great power conflict is a thing of the past. i want to ask you about these words the president uttered many listen to this closely. >> those countries that are large like russia or china, we have the kind of relationship with them we're not getting into conflicts of that sort at least over the last several decades, there's been a recognition that neither country benefits from that kind of g
link between energy and security. energy and prosperity. and when we don't develop our resources and when we are not able to feed others with our resources and so many others are reliant upon russia who does develop their resources and with that wealth are able to strengthen their military and their influence and power on the globe, then other nations are in trouble. >> well, it is interesting, i thought that k.t. mcfarland had good ideas. also that obama should send a delegation to the czech republic, central europe and help them develop fracking techniques. because then, a big part of the equation is russia is rendered impotent. now vladimir putin has control of that, right? >> right, and see in that building of pipelines is an example of developing natural resources and what they can provide to a region. and here, today, was -- in washingt washington, d.c., we had all of these protesters against the keystone pipeline. look, america needs pipelines just like other parts of the globe we talked about need their pipelines. we need ours. and the protesters grouping about, oh, i don
on from the election year. they have a plan to grow an economy use ingee inpen pens as -- energy and cutting backses would you tell a goal all americans share. >> we were talking about during the break we could put every person who wants a job if we could tap the resources to the economy. i am getting thousands of people jobs paying 70, can 80, 90 and 100,000 dollars a year. >> what you don't do is harm americans who are least able to afford energy. am energy effects all households. but when the regulation with the fuel city. jobs are lost. these least able to affohigher m closing crews. stay with us. it's a natural source of fiber and 5 essential vitamins. it's the smart choice for me. try sunsweet's amazing juices and new amazing prune light. iwe don't back down. we only know one direction: up so we're up early. up late. thinking up game-changing ideas, like this: dozens of tax free zones across new york state. move here. expand here. or start a new business here... and pay no taxes for 10 years. with new jobs, new opportunities and a new tax free plan. there's only one way for
sources of energy i want us to be able to say yes, we did. >> we're about to have a harsh reality. patrick moore is the co-founder of greenpeace, and he says zero evidence that the earth is warming because of human activity. mr. moore, welcome to the program. thank you for joining us. >> nice to be with you, sean. >> all right, i have felt this. and i have interviewed many people over the years. i agree with you but i'm surprised that it came from your mouth. explain. >> well, actually i left greenpeace a long time ago. i was one of the original founders, i was with them in the top committee. but by the mid-'80s they turned sharply to the left and began to adopt issues that i couldn't accept. i have a phd in ecology and am very versed in all the climate change matters. there is actually no scientific proof. it is not really about evidence so much. it is more about an actually scientific proof that humans are the main cause of the slight warming that has happened in this world over the last 100 years or so. in fact, the world started warming back after the little ice age about 250 years ago
be for a balanced budget. the republican would be for opening up energy drilling, tracking, natural gas all around the country. i would think they would be for health care savings accounts, controlling the border. there seems to be four or five things that the republicans ought to sit down, agree on and say, we'll do this if we get elected. i don't see a -- i don't see a single message coming out of republicans that says, we'll do this united if we're elected. >> but i think the things you just listed we all are united for, i think sometimes we're not doing a good enough job presenting that message to the people. and presenting it in a way that resonates with the people. but it's not that we disagree on any of things you just said. the one thing i would add to it is, is that we also care about growing the economy and creating jobs, and the way we would do it is by leaving more money at lomb. leaving more money in kentucky, in texas, in the hands of those who earn it, and that would be a stimulus that would work. and that we need to show that against a contrary distinction to the president's polici
Search Results 0 to 14 of about 15 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)